A recent article published in The Psychologist argues that Noah Hawley’s series Alien: Earth serves as more than just a sci-fi prequel. The article presents the series as a “clinical probe” into the evolving psychology of posthuman identity.
Set in the year 2120, the narrative introduces a world stratified by three distinct forms of being: cyborgs (enhanced humans), synths (AI androids), and hybrids (synthetic bodies imbued with human consciousness).
At the center of this ethical storm is Wendy, a hybrid housing the consciousness of a sick child transferred into an adult synthetic frame. Her existence forces a confrontation with fundamental philosophical questions: Is identity defined by biological tissue, memory, or the continuity of consciousness? Wendy’s dissonance—a child’s innocence trapped in a powerful, artificial vessel—illustrates the existential horror of lacking a schema for one’s own embodiment.
The article argues that Alien: Earth moves beyond the comforting logic of Isaac Asimov’s “Three Laws of Robotics” into a messy reality where consciousness is a commodity. The series’ antagonist, a trillionaire pursuing immortality through corporate experimentation, highlights a chilling potential future where “human rights” are determined by wealth and biological origin. This fictional scenario mirrors contemporary real-world anxieties regarding neuroprosthetics, brain-computer interfaces, and the monopolization of life-extending technologies.
Ultimately, the article posits that society must expand its moral compass. As the boundaries between flesh and machine blur, psychologists and ethicists are urged to proactively define new frameworks for dignity and autonomy. The true horror of Alien: Earth lies not in the extraterrestrial, but in the reflection of a society that might one day view the body as optional and the soul as patentable.
Posthumanism.Today 
Leave a comment